Economic Class Notes
This is a sample of our (approximately) 9 page long Economic Class notes, which we sell as part of the Immigration and Refugee Law Notes collection, a A- package written at University Of Ottawa in 2013 that contains (approximately) 76 pages of notes across 8 different documents.
The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.
Economic Class Revision
The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Immigration and Refugee Law Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.
PART IV: ECONOMIC CLASS (PRs) Three types: skilled worker, business immigrant and live in caregiver
economic immigrants have the opportunity to be family members (cannot obtain PR if not disclosed in application. If a dependent is inadmissible, that may affect the principal applicant. Must disclose all dependents and update if you have a child in a reasonable time period otherwise you could be deemed to have misrepresented and become inadmissible for 5 years. skilled worker program has the highest contingency
IRPA Provisions s. 12(2) (ECONOMIC IMMIGRATION)
s. 75(1) REGS (FEDERAL SKILLED WORKER)
Relevance Foreign national may be selected as a member of the economic class on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada Class of persons who are skilled workers and may become PR on basis of their ability to become economically established in CDA and who intend to reside in province other than QC. Technically able to work in other provinces, but there may be restrictions.
TYPE 1a: Federal Skilled Worker (*Onus on applicant to satisfy requirements) WHAT IS THE NOC?
Organizes over 30 000 job titles into 520 occupational group descriptions. In order to qualify, individual must have performed "all actions" described in lead statements, substantial number of main duties of occupation, and all essential duties of occupation. Not necessary they meet employment requirements. Should always indicate NOC requirements as close as you can (CIC is stringent about this). No right of appeal to IAD for skilled workers, but can seek review at FC (60 days to file for leave (Gulati v Canada 2010 FC). Can be reviewed on standard of correctness (procedural fairness) or mixed fact/discretion. STEP 1: Initial Threshold Required (main criteria) 1) Requires at least 1 yr of continuous, and paid work experience (full time or equal amount in part time) a. in single occupation b. within last ten years 2) Must be at Skill Type 0 (management occupations) or Skills A (professional occupations) or B (technical and trade occupations) of Canadian National Occupation Classification (NOC) 3) Performed substantial # of main duties of occupation as set out in NOC description 4) Scored 7 on each of 4 areas of reading, writing speaking and listening 5) Must have CDN diploma, certificate or credential or a foreign equivalent (if credentials from abroad, must have assessed by agency approved by CIC - assessment must be less than 5 yrs old) STEP 2:
1) Valid offer of employment OR a. permanent, full time and not seasonal work in NOC 0, A or B and working in CDA on WP that was granted through LMO or in job exempt from LMO OR employer has positive LMO from HRSDC 2) Have work experience in one of eligible occupations OR a. listed on CIC website (cap for total per category is 300) 3) Meet requirements of PhD stream (Cap 1000/yr) a. enrolled in CDN PhD program for at least 2 years, be in good academic standing, no award requiring return to home country OR graduated in past 12 months from PhD program w/no requirement to return to home country STEP 3: Point system
• 67 required (s. 76(2) REGS); must be met at time of application and when visa issued (s.77); MCI can change at any time based on economy, projected number of PRs and outstanding applications
• if multiple applications, onus on applicant to show which ones he wants to be considered under NOC; officer under duty to assess under each (Li v Canada 1990 FC)
CATEGORY Education (Reg 78)
- Cdn or equivalent assessed
- Range from 5 pts for secondary to 25 for PhD
- Upgrades before assessment considered
MAX # POINTS 25
Official Language (Reg 79)
- 24 max for first language and 4 for raised
- proficiency in EN or FR (16 pts for benchmark)
- plus 1 pt per area per benchmark
- must have language assessed by designated institution or provide evidence in writing
- most current must be used (less than 2 yrs old)
- can be given for full time work experience (30 hrs paid work) or part time
- must have been within previous 10 yrs
- must be within NOC under 0, A or B
- 18-36 = 12 pts
- to 1 point for age 46 (46 = 1 pt)
- no points under 18
- subtract 1 from12 for all past 36
- age locked in at time of app but if dependent at time submitted but not after lose status at decision (Hamid v CDA 2006 FCA); current dependent age is 22
- offer of indeterminate employment
- must already hold WP or have been offered job approved by officer based on HRSD opinion (offer must be genuine, FT, wages on par w/standards)
- concerns with application require communication and opportunity o respond
- language proficiency of spouse (5), study in CDA by applicant or spouse 2 yrs + (5), full time work in CDA in skilled occupation (10), full time work in CDA by spouse (5), relative in CDA pursuant to 83(5) (5), arranged employment (5)
Employment Experience (Reg 80) Age (Reg 81)
Arranged Employment (Reg 82)
Adaptability (Reg 83)
STEP 4: Financial Requirements (unless an offer of arranged employment)
• Reg 76(b) requires settlement funds: sufficient and available funds to meet requirements or that they have arranged employment as defined in Reg 82
• Funds must be 1) available 2) transferrable and 3) unencumbered by debts (liquid)
• Amount based on family size Substitute Evaluation (Reg 76(3))
• Officer holds discretion to issue visa to skilled worker that doesn't reach 67 pt threshold (may refuse) (Reg 76(3))
• Substituted evaluation must receive concurrence from senior officer (Reg 76(4))
• Applicant must request that officer exercise his or her discretion (Yan v Canada MCI)
• Officer does not have to look for exceptional circumstances unless asked to
• Feds can make changes to point system and apply retroactively if applied fairly (Kazi v Canada 2003 FC)
• Officer must identify and document facts demonstrating pts awarded not sufficient indicator for becoming economically est. in CDA; if negative for applicant, must provide sufficient opportunity for person to address officer's concerns
• Cannot exercise SE for 1) refusal due to insufficient funds (Reg 76(3)) 2) failure to meet definition of skilled worker (R75) JURISPRUDENCE - SKILLED WORKER
Dogra v Canada  FCJ No 560 (Permanent Residence Application) F: Citizen of India living in New York for last 5 years. Applied for PR as SW (she is a teacher and school guidance counselor). Rejected on grounds that she had not reached 70 units on pt system (para 9(1)(b)(i) of Immig regs). There were issues with respect to veracity of support letters re: guidance counseling and expressed lack of knowledge of CDN culture. It is alleged that he asked her questions about pop culture in Canada, what crack cocaine was, etc. I: Did the officer err in law when he evaluated the applicant's counseling experience at zero and deemed her to have no cultural knowledge?
D: yes Ratio: Lack of knowledge of Canadian customs and culture is not a requirement for receipt of a visa for permanent residence with respect to skilled workers. It is not an officer's job to assess equivalence of credentials (NOC prescribes this). Reasons: Officer erred in counting points (should have had 66, not 61), and understanding of school guidance counselor position (he noted it was in Pakistan while she worked in India). Both indicate a lack of care. Assessing equivalents of overseas applications is not something visa officers are necessarily equipped to do. There was cultural insensitivity to the claim that she would not be able to assist students who were not from her background. Rezaeiazar v Canada  FCJ No 804 (permanent residence application) F: Iranian citizen (professor) application as a federal skilled worker under 'university professor' code declined in Ankara by visa officer. 'Procedural Fairness Letter' indicated that visa officer was concerned w/point achievement for successful establishment in Canada. English test score was 0 for reading. Despite letter from brother indicating employment
****************************End Of Sample*****************************
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Immigration and Refugee Law Notes.